Problem set 3: Caching and File I/O

In this problem set, you’ll gain experience with caching by writing your own buffered I/O library.

Due Fri 10/20 at 11:59pm for college students (1 day later for extension)
This pset may be completed in pairs.
Reminder: You may not use code or solutions from previous years.

Get the code

Our code is released in the cs61-psets repository. To update it, run

git remote show handout

If this reports an error, run

git remote add handout git://github.com/cs61/cs61-psets-f17.git

Then run

git pull handout master

This will merge our handout code with your previous work. If you have any “conflicts” from problem set 1 or 2, resolve them before continuing further. Run git push to save this merge back to your private repository.

Use an explicit merge. If you copy code by hand, our automated scripts will have trouble analyzing your code, and it’ll be harder for you to incorporate our updates.

You may also create a new cs61-psets repository for this problem set. However, you will need our help: some issues with our use of GitHub Classroom make it difficult for you to create a new repository yourself. Write cs61-staff@g.harvard.edu for help. Tell us (1) your GitHub username and (2) the name of the repo you want to create. Once the repo is ready, make sure you update the grading server.

Goal

We’ve released a simple library, IO61, to perform I/O to/from files. You will find the code in the pest directory in the file io61.c. Our version of IO61 is pretty stupid—it uses character-at-a-time system call I/O and is thus quite slow. Your goal is simple: speed it up using caching.

We also distribute several programs that use IO61. (The grading server has some secret extra programs too!)

cat61 reads a file sequentially one character at a time and writes it to standard output.
blockcat61 is like cat61, but reads the file sequentially one block at a time. Its -b BLOCKSIZE argument sets the block size.
randblockcat61 is like blockcat61, but it chooses a random block size for each read and write. It still reads and writes sequentially (only the block sizes are random). The -b argument is the maximum possible block size. This may very well stress your caching solution.
reverse61 reads a file a character at a time in reverse and writes the result to standard output.
stride61 reads its input file using a strided access pattern, writing the data it reads sequentially. By strided, we mean that it begins at offset 0, reads BLOCKSIZE bytes, seeks to position STRIDE, reads another bloc, seeks to position (2 * STRIDE), etc. When it gets to the end of the file, it jumps back to the first bytes not yet read and repeats the pattern. The -b and -s arguments set the block size and stride length, respectively.
reordercat61 reads its input file one block at a time in random order and writes each block to the output file at the correct position. The result is a copy of the input file, but created non-sequentially.
gather61 can take two or more input files. It reads blocks from them in round-robin order to create its single output file. This will test your ability to handle multiple input files.
scatter61 can take two or more output files. It reads blocks from a single input file, then writes them to the output files in round-robin order. This will test your ability to handle multiple output files.

Introduce buffering (that is, caching) to the io61_file abstraction and use them to speed up IO61 operations.

We’re giving you tons of freedom to implement the file caches as you like. You may even use memory-mapped I/O, prefetching system calls like madvise or posix_fadvise, or multiple threads or processes (although none of these are required). But you may not use another buffered I/O library or caching I/O library.

Your library should:

Return correct results for all access patterns and file types, including multiple files, very large files, non-seekable files, files that return short reads or accept short writes, mixtures of calls (for instance, alternating io61_read and io61_readc), and random accesses.
Perform as well as stdio on sequential reads and writes for any files, including very large files (such as files that don’t fit in memory) and non-seekable files.
Improve on stdio’s performance for some non-sequential access patterns, such as simple strides or reverse access.

All your code should fit in io61.c.

Evaluation

We will evaluate you based on your code’s performance relative to a version of IO61 that uses stdio. That version is provided for you for testing in stdio-io61.c (and the makefile builds stdio-cat61, stdio-blockcat61, and so forth).

Run make check to see how your current implementation is doing on a battery of tests. This will also print summary statistics at the end. Run make check-TESTNUMBERS (e.g., make check-9 or make check-5-10 or make check-1,2,3) to run selected tests.

We may update the tests during the pset release period. We may also run additional tests during grading. In all instances, correctness counts—that is, a program that runs quickly but incorrectly is worse than a program that runs slowly!

Roadmap

It’s easy in this problem set to design something too complex and get yourself stuck. Avoid that problem by tackling the simple cases first. Here’s a possible roadmap.

First, you can improve the way io61_read and io61_write work without introducing a cache. Use strace to investigate the operation of blockcat61. Look at the blockcat61 code; what system calls do you think it should make? Then run strace -o strace.out ./blockcat61 blockcat61.c. (That command line tells strace to write its output to strace.out, so examine strace.out with a command like less strace.out.) What system calls does blockcat61 actually make?
- This will improve your performance on the block I/O tests (e.g., make check-4-6).
Then, implement a single-slot cache buffer for reading sequential files. This will hold bytes [N, N+B) of the file, where B is some largish number (try different numbers). Any read request that lies within that range of bytes can be satisfied without making a system call. In the book’s terminology, this is a single-slot cache. Check your work by examining strace output. Don’t worry about seeks yet. (This means your code will stop working on the “reverse order,” “stride order,” and “random seek order” tests.)
- This will improve your performance on character I/O tests.
Then, implement a single-slot cache buffer for writing sequential files. This is like the cache buffer for reading, but it absorbs writes instead of prefetching reads.
- This will improve your performance on character I/O tests. If you do this well, you should now match or beat stdio’s performance on all sequential I/O tests!
Then, fix your code to handle seeks correctly (but not necessarily in a high-performance way). This is actually pretty easy.
- This should make your code produce correct results for all tests.
Then, fix your code to handle seeks correctly, but with good performance for reverse61. For ideas, try running strace on the stdio-reverse61 variant. What does it look like stdio is doing?
- This should make your code roughly equal stdio’s performance on all tests.
Then, if you feel ambitious, you might try changing your code to use memory-mapped I/O when this is possible. Note: Memory-mapped I/O is not always possible, though, so keep your old block cache around for pipe files and other non-mappable files. (Mmap is not required; it is optional.)
- This should make your code beat stdio on some non-sequential I/O tests!
Then, if you have additional time and feel even more ambitious, implement an associative cache that works for non-mappable files or for very large memory-mapped files.
- Something like this will get the highest performance.
- It is difficult and rewarding to implement an associative cache. You’ll learn a lot! But design carefully so you don't make your other code more difficult to read and maintain. In fact, you might try working on a separate branch initially.

Hints

Read our file descriptors notes.
Some of our tests, particularly on shorter files, are noisy, and can produce different timing results when run multiple times.
You will likely need to change most of the functions in io61.c.
To handle reordered I/O and particularly stride I/O, you will need to be clever and implement memory-mapped I/O and/or more complex cache algorithms.
Stdio is a well-written package! It is OK if you can’t always beat it, especially for sequential I/O.
Write your own tests! This will help you shake out bugs in your code, particularly correctness bugs. What diabolical things can you think of to try? You can add new tests pretty easily; just edit GNUmakefile and check.pl.
You can run the tests on their own, too. make check creates some useful input files for testing and puts them in files/.

You are allowed to make a couple assumptions.

You may assume that any file descriptor passed to io61_fdopen has its file pointer set to 0 (the beginning of the file).
You don’t need to set the file pointer after every call to io61_seek.

Building

If you want to compile without optimization (which might help you debug), run make O=0 or edit the GNUmakefile to set O = 0 by default. Your code should work safely with sanitizers turned on; try make SANITIZE=1 check.

Extra credit: Deadlock

We also release a program, pipeexchange61, that demonstrates a problem with conventional blocking I/O. The pipeexchange61 program forks two copies of itself. One copy, the requester, sends requests to the other copy, the responder. The requester can send many requests back-to-back and only then wait for responses (a form of batching). When you run pipeexchange61, the program appears to get stuck! Why? Can you construct an I/O library that unsticks pipeexchange61, without modifying pipeexchange61.c?

Turnin

You will turn in your code by pushing your git repository to github.com and updating the grading server with your repository.

Don’t forget to fill out README.md and AUTHORS.md.

This pset was originally created for CS61.